Cherry picking from different spaces to create a hybrid document in a new space

Comments

18 comments

  • Avatar
    Henricus Fluthgraf

    Hi roman, First Short feedback

    in my opinion thee are two use cases.

    a) I have different handouts, which contains in 60% the same content

    b) i often use for different projects some standardised information / snippets  (e.g. written by third party authors. This can’t be organised by blueprints, because therefore I need to add a page (I often not want to do)

    one solution, in my opinion, can be a libary space (or more than one, because of different themes).

    -every tree can be a information or a container (subtrees) of information. This means, that the Titel is used for the search but not part of the content to copy (to discuss)

    - in a Macro i can search for the snippets or scroll and pick 

     

    etc. 

     

    BEST  Henry 

     

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Nils Bier

    Hi Deborah,

    thanks for contacting us.

    The includeplus macro does currently only work within one single space - it's not possible to include pages from other spaces. (Please vote and watch the following improvement: https://k15t.jira.com/browse/VSN-766).
    Have you thought about using variants in your master space and then publish each customer specific information from multiple spaces into one space (and make this one available for the corresponding customer)?

    Would that work?

    Best,
    Nils

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Martin Kellner

    Hi Deborah, Nils,

    I'm an already known fan of the non existing / compatible include excerpt/page macros. Nils was already waiting for my comment ;-) I wish to have it working too.

    The variant way only works for products that are nearly of the same kind. Otherwise you mix up content that doesn't belong together. We speak of "agile content creation", which also means, that "documentation only" team members might be (already) reduced. The variant way would insert content that belongs to a total different team/product. Ok it broadens one's horizon but it doesn't push productivity or helps keeping the content manageable.

    It is a workaround for some use cases but we successfully used the include page and excerpt macro in the past .... suddenly it was gone when we started using scroll translations.

    Regards

    Martin

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Deborah Schindelman

    Hello Nils,

    I notice in the related item you mentioned that pulling content from multiple spaces is specifically mentioned for the next version of the IncludePlus macro. Any kind of timeline for that?

    Thanks,

    Deborah

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Nils Bier

    Hi Deborah,

    as Martin (Hi Martin ;)) already pointed out, content reuse is a big requirement especially in the techcomm industry. As we're aware that Scroll Versions can be improved in its content reuse capabilities, we plan to have a closer look at the reuse functionality as soon as possible. Most likely that will be part of our next version of Scroll Versions, however I can't give you an ETA on this currently.

    Please feel free to vote the mentioned issue to get a notification on every status change.

    Best,Nils

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Martin Kellner

    Hi Nils,

    I understand the process of agile software development good enough to predict this answer ... you can't give an ETA for a feature that is still in your backlog.

    But ...

    • Reuse is always an aspect of your product presentation (https://www.k15t.com/blog/2014/02/how-to-reuse-content-in-atlassian-confluence-with-scroll-versions). Of course you showed up the variants workaround - doesn't always work ... we already discussed this
    • you made the confluence integrated macros for content reuse unusable
    • All the isssues around content reuse are 2 to 3 years old now.
    • Both issues are in the top 10 of user voting of open issues at the moment. This isn't a bad position for 322 open issues. But don't tell me that the sample space is too small for good statistics ... ;-)

    Regards

    Martin

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Nils Bier

    Hi Martin,

    all the mentioned points are totally valid, which is why we're planning to focus on the content reuse features in the next VSN version.

    Best,Nils

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Eugen

    Hi Nils, 

    are there any news about this issue? Ticket was created in 2013 and last updated here in 2015... I still can't find a option to include content from other spaces using the include+ macro. Are there any workarounds for that? Using variants to manage reusable content is no option for us. 

    Best, Eugen

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Henricus Fluthgraf

    Hi Nils,

     

    i am also interessed in a solution. We discussed it different times before we started using Scorll Versions and the other Tools.

    We have different Handouts / Books, which based on a mix of reused parts. To pick it up from a Special Space  (libary space) or to pick it up from another space would be very good.

    In my opinion, a Standard in technical documentation. Something you are writing on your banner for your tools.

    Best, Henry


    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Martin Kellner

    We moved to Confluence nearly five years ago and one of the promised advantages was the reuse of content. This worked until we started using Scroll Versions / Translations for versioning and translation management. Perhaps using Scroll Translations would have been enough to choose from our 2018 view. Translation management works quite good with the newly adopted XLIFF format but content reuse is still an error-prone manual job which requires a lot of time.

    But there is not even a roadmap to show that the content reuse feature (including content from other spaces) will ever come back.

    Variants are not an option at all. We already have spaces with 400-500 pdf equivalent pages. We don't want monster spaces with 1000+ pages which contain content that only shares let's say 10-25% of its pages between different variants. The other content is disjunctive.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Roman Serazhiev (Edited )

    Hi Martin, Henry.

    Thanks for the feedback, great to hear that you are still interested in content reuse in Scroll Versions. We are trying to improve the transparency regarding the roadmap, however a quick reply on the mentioned topic. 

    We have already started working on this issue as it is one of the top voted and watched ones. We can't currently provide you a release date but I can say that we are actively working on the feature. Please watch this Jira issue to be notified on upcoming updates.

    We would also be happy to get your input on this feature. If you are open for a call so you could describe your use-case and the feature you would like to see, this would help us a lot :-)

    Cheers,
    Roman.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Martin Kellner

    Hi Roman,

    I was already talking to Tobias Anstett in January and November 2016 concerning content reuse. If it is helpful, I would of course do it one more time. We already discussed conceptual ideas at the two phone calls.

    Regards

    Martin Kellner

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Roman Serazhiev

    Hi Henry,

    Thanks for your use-case and the proposed solution. I have passed this on to our team.

    Cheers,
    Roman.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Roman Serazhiev

    Hi Martin,

    I have talked with Tobias and he clarified what you have discussed during the phone calls. The requirements hasn't changed since that time, and what we are working right now is still aligned to those discussed features and capabilities.

    I will reach out to you directly to provide more information.

    Cheers,
    Roman.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Henricus Fluthgraf

    Hi Roman,

    i have to decide how to go on.

    The Scroll include macro wont work, because i have different Versions (Libary and Handbook). And also it seems to be limitted to a libary fo one space.

    Is there any workarround?

    • Copy and Paste of a tree seems not working, because of scroll Versions.

    Need Help. at this Moment i have to write the same thing different times. If i have to Change something, it is absolutely uncomfortable to make the changes at every Point wich related to.

    Best Henry

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Roman Serazhiev

    Hi Henry.

    If you are using a separate space as a library space, the only way to achieve this currently is to either use Include macro or manually type the content.

    You could create a space without Versions as a library space and use the built-in Include macro to include the text or pages.

    Would this work for you?

    Cheers,
    Roman.

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Henricus Fluthgraf

    I will try,

    will the built in include function works with versioned spaces and translation.?

     

    best Henry

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Roman Serazhiev

    Hi Henry.

    Include macro works in all spaces. If you are including pages from a versioned space, you would have to specify a certain versioned page. So, in this functionality, the macro is not dynamic. That is why I would recommend creating a non-versioned Include Library space. You can then use Include macro to select pages from a non-versioned space. 

    To workaround the incompatibility with Scroll Translations, you could create a page per language in the Include Library space (which doesn't have Versions or Translations installed).

    Cheers,
    Roman.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Powered by Zendesk